The evidential power of beauty science and theology meet

The Evidential Power of Beauty : Science and Theology Meet by Thomas Dubay (, Paperback) | eBay

the evidential power of beauty science and theology meet

The Evidential Power of Beauty has ratings and 14 reviews. Enjoyed pretty much all of this book and his insights into beauty from science to theology. The Evidential Power of Beauty: Science and Theology Meet [Thomas Dubay] on gtfd.info *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. While everyone is. The Evidential Power of Beauty Science and Theology Meet. 2 likes. Book.

Not surprisingly, Sartre's atheism is termed postulatory; that is, he was atheistic not because he proved his views they cannot be provedbut because he postulated them.

  • The Evidential Power of Beauty : Science and Theology Meet by Thomas Dubay (1999, Paperback)
  • The Evidential Power of Beauty
  • Follow the Author

He presumed them and attempted no proof. Normal, unbiased people with no philosophical axe to grind immediately see the convincing power of design and beauty. Despite continuing and vast propaganda for materialistic evolution in our public schools, colleges, and universities and in the print and electronic media over several generations, the large majority of our population reject the chance-alone view of evolution.

They see through the propaganda and know immediately that chance explains nothing of the beauty and obvious design we see everywhere.

The Evidential Power of Beauty : Science and Theology Meet by Thomas Dubay (1999, Paperback)

Johnson, who has written worthy critiques of the chance idea, has recently commented that "[Carl] Sagan himself worried about opinion polls showing that only 10 percent of Americans believe in a strictly materialistic evolutionary process.

Evolutionary Ponderings The idea that living species in all their magnificence could slowly develop from rudimentary beginnings to marvelously complex and beautiful fish and flowers, birds and beasts, is attractive, even charming. I have no theological problem with the concept, and no biblical difficulty either. Biblical fundamentalists have many problems, but that is due to their interpreting the Scriptures as a scientific text, which clearly it is not, nor has it any intention to be.

Genesis is no more making scientific statements about our origins than is the daily newspaper when it reports times of sunrise and sunset.

Contrary to the impression given by the popular media, the problems with gradualism in evolution are scientific.

Recent developments in biochemistry and microbiology, as we have intimated, conclusively demonstrate that gradual changes by natural selection and random chance are impossible.

The reader should note that this is not a theological statement; it is the conclusion of scientific experts in the two fields. In addition there is the negative conclusion of paleontology: Darwin himself honestly admitted that if his theory were correct, there would have to be innumerable transitional developments. There are no theological problems with evolution, provided it remains firmly within scientifically verifiable facts and sheds any baseless philosophical bias against design.

If facts compellingly demand design, as they do, honest science embraces the evidence and the conclusions. As we have noted in this chapter, our best scientists find no problem with what is here being stated. It is also interesting to note that Saint Augustine, back in the fourth or fifth century, has some lines that favor the evolutionary idea, and he seemed to find no problem with it. For the sake of clarity we should remark that all through this question we are speaking not of microevolution tiny changes in life forms but of macroevolution major changes.

Microbiologist Michael Denton puts the matter well: A bit more needs to be said. Both in the geological strata and in common contemporary observations there are no transitional organisms in the animal kingdom. Every species appears from the beginning perfect according to its kind. There are no eyes 40 percent or 80 percent suited to seeing. Falcons do not five in a clumsy fashion for a million years and slowly hone their skills during the next million years.

Hummingbirds do not hover for eons in an awkward way, nor do dolphins swim in a hit-and-miss manner before they finally learn their graceful and flawless elegance.

the evidential power of beauty science and theology meet

The cheetah's body is a wonder, ideally constructed to achieve high running speeds, but there are no records of sluggish cheetahs. Fleas' mechanisms and muscles are always made to perform their stunning feats of high jumping with remarkable skills.

Everywhere we find perfect design with no partial bunglings on the way. Another devastating blow to the theory of gradual transitional changes that might bring about a new species is the sheer lack of time such changes would require. Denton tells us that "evolution by natural selection is in essence merely a special case of problem solving by trial and error.

This implies that every evolutionary route followed during the course of evolution to every adaptive end must have been initially discovered and traced out as the result of a process which is in the end nothing more nor less than a gigantic random search. They now routinely discuss the sudden biological burst "that produced almost all major groups of modern animals in an astonishingly short span of time", reports Science News in a recent issue.

Called the Cambrian explosion, this "biological Big Bang" was a giant leap in innovation, with the sudden appearance of "animals sporting novel features such as shells, skeletons, legs, and antennae. That event transformed life. Bowring of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. To compound the enormity of Darwin's claims, we note that this frenzy of alleged drastic changes occurred about million years ago, and "since then, advanced animals have stuck with those same basic body plans; no new ones have evolved", adds Bowring.

Ecumenical councils thus arose to explicate doctrine and dogma, which would further and more clearly unite the Church around the world.

Whitehead gives a detailed account of the first four such councils: Nicaea inConstantinople inEphesus inand Chalcedon in He supplies not only the background to the theological questions which were in need of clarification but also the proceedings and the persons involved in each Council. Most of this book is devoted to showing how the primacy of Rome was understood in the early Church. Whitehead demonstrates how the most ancient Sees, such as Alexandria and Antioch, looked to Rome to decide once and for all such questions as the dating of Easter, episcopal appointments, and whether or not those Christians who capitulated to pagans during times of persecution needed to be baptized again.

Whitehead does a good job in showing that Rome enjoyed pre-eminence not because it happened to be the home of the Emperor, but because it was the home of Peter and his Successors.

Even as temporal power shifted to Constantinople in the middle of the fourth century, Christians around the world continued to look to Rome for spiritual guidance and strength.

Whitehead does not avoid thorny questions e. This book is a sweeping overview, and as such cannot help but at times tend toward generalization. Nonetheless, this work will prove worthwhile for those who want to get acquainted with a crucial period in Church history, as well as those who question the roots and beginnings of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Science and Theology Meet. By Thomas Dubay, S. Two unchallenged assumptions float across the world like Goodyear blimp ads, kept aloft by their gaseous appeal. The second is that Religion and Science Are Incompatible.

the evidential power of beauty science and theology meet

This second assumption claims that theology deals with dogma and other intangible whatevers brought to us by a God who may or may not exist, while science, grounded in experimental verification, deals with reality.

Put more baldly, the former is about feelings, the latter about facts. A new book by renowned spiritual writer and retreat director Fr. Thomas Dubay, The Evidential Power of Beauty, takes on these and other assumptions, and attempts to offer an apologetic that would find common ground between the two disciplines.

Drawing on many sources from both camps, Dubay locates this common ground in beauty itself, or, as he frequently puts it, elegance.

The Evidential Power of Beauty by Thomas Dubay

In other books, Fr. John of the Cross or Teresa of Avila, he is second to none. In The Evidential Power of Beauty, when he describes prodigious pulsars, scintillating subatomic particles, or hearty hummingbirds, one is tempted to cheer aloud at the mind-boggling symmetry and intricacy of it all.